USPTO serial 98680204
AGD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRARY, LISA J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine P. Califa
Katherine P. Califa Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for authentication and analysis of data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for verification of digital assets, data, and credits on a blockchain ledger; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing, combining and enriching data from multiple sources in a controlled environment for business using machine learning processing, machine vision technology, and artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring artificial intelligence-enabled software for use in collecting, compiling, analyzing, verifying, evaluating, visualizing, reporting, and authenticating data to determine and report real-world performance metrics and related information; namely, information regarding sustainability and environmental impact; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for data management and reporting regarding empirically quantified information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for sustainability and impact data management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in artificial intelligence-driven predictive modeling of future climate performance | ACTIVE | Dec 23, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |