USPTO serial 98680866
TRUSTCORE PAYMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUSTCORE PAYMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Lampel
Justin Lampel LAMPEL LAW. P.C.555 Skokie Blvd., Suite 500Northbrook, IL 60062United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit debit card transaction processing; Third party payment processing made through debit and credit cards direct payments; Automated Clearing House (ACH) transaction and check processing services; Processing payments between individuals and merchants through debit and credit cards direct payments; Gift card transaction processing; electronic funds transfer; Surcharge payment processing; Credit card transaction processing services; Credit card verification; Electronic credit card transactions processing services; Processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Providing secure commercial transactions and payment processing options using a mobile device at a point of sale; Financial advisory services in the field of money lending; Check processing; debit and card issuing services; computerized financial transaction authorization services , namely, providing secure commercial transactions processing and payment options; computerized financial transaction authorization, namely, facilitating authorization for identifying financial service providers and consumer financial products all for authorization purposes; computerized financial transaction authorization, namely, providing a payment gateway and controlling access to and communication with computers and computer networks for financial transactions; Computerized financial transaction authorization services featuring embedded finance solutions in the nature of a payment gateway services, namely, facilitating authorization and processing by providing merchant payment services;. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |