USPTO serial 98684692
KT BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEAL, KELLY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with KT BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hempstead, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik J. Osterrieder
Erik J. Osterrieder Kearney, McWilliams & Davis55 Waugh Dr., Ste. 150Houston, TX 77007United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; Lipstick; Cleaning preparations; Hair care preparations; Lip gloss; Lipstick cases; Make-up; Make-up removing preparations; Micellar water; Petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; Skin lighteners; Sunscreen preparations; Tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; Tissues impregnated with make-up removing preparations; Cosmetic oils; Make-up powder; Non-medicated lotions for skin, hair, face, and body; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Scented oils; Skin bronzer | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Make-up brushes; Sponges used for applying make-up | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |