USPTO serial 98689489
TOSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOO MEE KIM
JOO MEE KIM ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC901 NEW YORK AVENUE NWSUITE 900 EASTWASHINGTON, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services, namely, transferring of funds from accounts; money transfer via wireless communications; banking services via wireless communications; internet banking services; electronic funds transfer by telecommunications; rental of automated-teller machines; home banking services; exchanging money; stock investment consultancy via wireless communications; providing electronic processing of accounts transaction; processing of electronic payments via wireless communications; insurance underwriting services for all types of insurance; transfer of funds; direct debit services, namely, money transfer; provision of information in the field of financing via wireless communications; placement of funds; provident fund services, namely, individual retirement account services; fund raising; money brokerage services, namely, financial investment brokerage; consumer lending services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |