USPTO serial 98691157
CITY OF FLOWERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITY OF FLOWERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Blaier
Adam Blaier Brown & Blaier, PC33 N. Main StreetMarlboro, NJ 07746United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Smoking articles, namely, ashtrays, electronic cigarettes sold filled with flavorings other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes for smokers, oral vaporizers sold filled with flavorings other than essential oils, for use in oral vaporizers for smokers, lighters, and rolling trays; Flavorings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; Disposable personal oral vaporizers for smoking purposes, sold filled with flavorings other than essential oils, for use in oral vaporizers for smokers; Non-tobacco, herbal cigarettes, pre-packaged smokeable hemp flower, dried hemp flower for smoking, pre-rolled hemp cigars, pre-rolled hemp cigarettes; all of the foregoing containing goods derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; none of the foregoing being for use with cannabis with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |