USPTO serial 98691880
DEMANDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEMANDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rajesh Fotedar
Rajesh Fotedar Cognition IP P.C.50 California St., 1500San Francisco, CA 94111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online, non-downloadable software for estimation of the value of personal injury claims with reference to cases, verdicts and damages computations; providing online, non-downloadable software with functionality for receiving data input for determining case value for personal injury claims, automating legal research, assessing and generating estimates of damages and economic losses for personal injury claims; providing online, non- downloadable software for searching and providing information related to personal injury case value; Providing online, non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for estimation of the value of personal injury claims with reference to cases, verdicts and damages computations; Providing online, non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence with functionality for receiving data input for determining case value for personal injury claims, automating legal research, assessing and generating estimates of damages and economic losses for personal injury claims; Providing online, non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for searching and providing information related to personal injury case value | ACTIVE | Feb 21, 2022 |
| 045 | Legal services, namely, providing consulting and assessment of personal injury case value and damages estimates; Legal services, namely, providing consulting and assessment of personal injury case value and damages estimates calculated via artificial intelligence techniques | ACTIVE | Feb 21, 2022 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2026 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 7, 2026 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2026 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |