USPTO serial 98694517
NITROTEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NITROTEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kameron W. Kramer
Kameron W. Kramer LAW 4 SMALL BUSINESS OF TEXAS, PLLC1846 N Loop 1604 W, Suite 205San Antonio, TX 78248United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Aircraft performance testing; Design of engineering products; Product testing; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of aviation; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of aircraft components; Scientific and technological services, namely, testing in the field of aviation; Scientific and technological services, namely, performance testing in the field of aviation; Scientific and technological services, namely, testing in the field of aircraft components; Scientific and technological services, namely, performance testing in the field of aircraft components; Testing the functionality of apparatus and instruments; Testing the functionality of apparatus and instruments in the nature of aircraft components; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of goods or services of others to the order and specification of Federal Aviation Administration; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of goods or services of others to the order and specification of European Union Aviation Safety Agency; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of goods or services of others to the order and specification of Civil Aviation Administration of China; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of the goods of others to assure compliance with industry standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of aircraft components to assure compliance with industry standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of aircraft components to assure compliance with Federal Aviation Administration industry standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of aircraft components to assure compliance with European Union Aviation Safety Agency industry standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of aircraft components to assure compliance with Civil Aviation Administration of China industry standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of aircraft components to determine conformity with certification standards; Custom design and engineering of aircraft components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |