USPTO serial 98704923
IMAGINE DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNING, KATHRYN ELISABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAGINE DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Geza C. Ziegler Jr.
Geza C. Ziegler Jr. ZIEGLER IP LAW GROUP LLC.2000 Post Road, Suite 205Fairfield, CT 06824United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded content; Information technology and audio-visual, multimedia and photographic devices; Media content; Databases; System and system support software, and firmware; Software; Software for monitoring, analysing, controlling and running physical world operations; Computer gaming software; Application software; Web application and server software; Virtual and augmented reality software; Interactive entertainment software; Downloadable game software; Software programs for video games; Computer software for entertainment; Entertainment software; Data and file management and database software; Media and publishing software; Mobile apps; Communication, networking and social networking software; Artificial intelligence and machine learning software; E-commerce and e-payment software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | IT services; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; IT security, protection and restoration; Software development, programming and implementation; Hosting services, software as a service, and rental of software; Providing online, non-downloadable software; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software; Providing software on a global computer network; Rental of computer software; Platforms for gaming as software as a service [SaaS]; Hosting of e-commerce platforms on the Internet; Platform as a service [PaaS]; Rental of application software; Application service provider services; Rental of computer software and programs; Software as a service [SaaS] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |