USPTO serial 98704988
MUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, CATHERINE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivek Jayaram
Vivek Jayaram Jayaram PLLC54 W 21st St., Suite 801New York, NY 10010United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software featuring digital communication for collaboration on projects; Downloadable computer application software for the purposes of allowing remote collaboration by musicians, producers, audio engineers; Software featuring digital communication platform for collaboration on projects; downloadable software for facilitating live digital communication between users via live video and audio conferencing, network conferencing, web conferencing, conducting audio and video teleconferencing, and web messaging with multiple simultaneous users; downloadable software for teleconferencing and web conferencing; downloadable software for teleconferencing and web conferencing services to facilitate remote audio recording and collaboration; downloadable cloud-based software for storing and managing electronic data; downloadable software featuring services for project collaboration in the field of music, videography, and entertainment | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2021 |
| 038 | Teleconferencing services; video conferencing services | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2021 |
| 042 | software as a service (SAAS) services featuring non-downloadable software for facilitating live digital communication between users via live video and audio conferencing with multiple simultaneous users, teleconferencing, network conferencing, web conferencing, and messaging via platform; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring non-downloadable software for use in managing and sharing contact information, hosting, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and websites, in the fields of remote audio collaboration; software as a service (SAAS) services for providing a website featuring technology enabling users to remotely work and collaborate with other musicians, producers, audio engineers, and creators; software as a service (SAAS) services for a website featuring software that enables users to remotely create audio drama series and episodes, write scripts, record and mix audio, publish produced audio, track and analyze audio statistics, advertise and market audio; software as a service (SAAS) services for hosting software platforms for remote or virtual audio collaboration; providing virtual and remote audio studio services; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites, in the fields of remote audio collaboration; providing a website featuring technology enabling users to remotely work and collaborate with other musicians, producers, audio engineers, and creators; providing a website featuring on-line downloadable software that enables users to remotely create audio drama series and episodes, write scripts, record and mix audio, publish produced audio, track and analyze audio statistics, advertise and market audio; hosting software platforms for remote or virtual audio collaboration | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |