Drawing for DUROLENS

USPTO serial 98705481

DUROLENS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWEENEY, MOLLY B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUROLENS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney L. Skoglund

Rodney L. Skoglund Renner, Kenner, Greive, Bobak, Taylor & Weber106 S. Main StreetSuite 400Akron, OH 44308-1412

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software platforms for machine vision artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning, namely, software that contains learning algorithms that continuously analyzes data and conducts quality error-proofing; Data communication interfaces for machine vision cameras and sensors; computer hardware and downloadable software for controlling camera and sensor operation; computer hardware and downloadable software for real-time object detection systems for detection, sorting, screening, classification, counting, and identification of objects.ABANDONED—
042Design and development of computer software and software architecture in the field of machine vision, deep learning, and artificial intelligence solutions; development of computer platforms for real-time image and sensor data processing and computer programming services for data processing of real-time images; provision of artificial intelligence software development services for use with machine vision systems, image and sensed data analysis, and visual inspection systems.ABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2025ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 19, 2025MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 2025ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 2025EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2025ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Sep 8, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 8, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance