USPTO serial 98710822
TRUST AUTOMATION, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEAN, JULES J.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUST AUTOMATION, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Luis Obispo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Lebens
Thomas F. Lebens Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP120 South LaSalle Street, Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60603United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Control systems comprised of embedded controllers, automation hardware, namely high-performance hardware controller components; sensors and actuators for monitoring and controlling mechanical systems, mechanical systems, assemblies and motors; circuit boards, namely specialized circuit boards; electronic assemblies, namely complete electronic assemblies designed for complex applications; control software and firmware, namely custom software for controlling and monitoring automated systems; user interface software, namely tailored user interface software for user interaction with control systems | ACTIVE | May 12, 2005 |
| 042 | User interface development; engineering and design services for automation systems, namely system integration, custom design and development, and engineering consulting services; consulting services for automation strategies, system design, and optimization; system testing and validation services; technical support and maintenance services for automation systems; training and documentation services for maintenance and operation of automation systems | ACTIVE | May 12, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |