Drawing for VIUS BUILT

USPTO serial 98715613

VIUS BUILT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GERHART, NIKOLAUS C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 135

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIUS BUILT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott C. Hilton

Scott C. Hilton Kunzler Bean & Adamson50 W. Broadway, Ste. 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable business software for receipt capture; Downloadable cloud-based software for project management and receipt capture; Computer programs, downloadable, for project management and receipt capture; Computer software applications, downloadable, for project managementACTIVE—
042Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to manage construction projects and capture construction receipts; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for project management and receipt capture; Providing an online non-downloadable Internet-based system application featuring technology enabling users to manage projects and capture images of receipts; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for receipt capture; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for project managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 14, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 14, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance