USPTO serial 98716800
DABPOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COUGHLAN, REBECCA D.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DABPOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kayleigh A. Hartwig
Kayleigh A. Hartwig Bayramoglu Law Offices LLC1540 West Warm Springs Road, Suite 100Henderson, NV 89014United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Devices for heating tobacco for the purpose of inhalation; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of vegetable glycerin; Electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of propylene glycol; Cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, for electronic cigarettes; Chemical flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; Electronic cigarette atomizers sold empty and not for use with essential oils; Electronic cigarette liquid comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used in electronic cigarettes; Electronic cigarettes; Electronic devices for the inhalation of nicotine-containing aerosol; Flavourings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; Oral vaporizers for smokers sold empty and not for use with essential oils; Liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes, other than essential oils; Replaceable refill cartridges for electronic cigarettes sold empty and not for use with essential oils; Cigarettes; Tobacco substitutes not for medical purposes not being essential oils; Electronic devices for the inhalation of hemp containing aerosol; Oral vaporizers for smoking purposes, sold empty, which evaporate hemp into aerosol for inhalation; Electronic devices, namely, oral vaporizers for smoking purposes, sold empty, for evaporation of solid hemp concentrates, other then essential oils, into aerosol for inhalation; Cartridges sold filled with solid hemp concentrates other than essential oils, for electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers; Cartridges sold filled with liquid hemp concentrates, other than essential oils, for electronic cigarettes and oral vaporizers; all of the foregoing for use with hemp solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; none of the foregoing containing or for use with essential oils; none of the foregoing for use with goods that are medicinal, therapeutic, or ingestible | ACTIVE | Feb 20, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |