Drawing for THE PHARIS FIRST LINE TIRE

USPTO serial 98717105

THE PHARIS FIRST LINE TIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PHARIS FIRST LINE TIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen Adams

Stephen Adams Chambliss, Bahner, & Stophel, P.C.605 Chestnut Street, Suite 1700Chattanooga, TN 37450United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobile tires; Bicycle tires; Motorcycle tires; Inner tubes for automobile tires; Inner tubes for bicycle tires; Inner tubes for motorcycle tiresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 15, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 11, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 10, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 9, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2025MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance