USPTO serial 98717538
ROUND 5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JONES, JACQUELYN ANDREA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROUND 5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Richmond Hill, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eunyoung Lee
Eunyoung Lee Monami Law Group PLLC100 LARA ST. UNIT 508MANASSAS PARK, VA 20111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Action figures and accessories therefor; Collectable toy figures; Modeled plastic toy figurines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |