USPTO serial 98725603
THE WAY IT SHOULD BE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCLEIDOROVICH, JOANNA YAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE WAY IT SHOULD BE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Johanson
Justin Johanson Rocket Legal Professional Services, Inc.4050 S. 500 W., Suite 50 DPT# 14057Salt Lake City, UT 84123United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultancy and information services relating to information technology architecture and infrastructure; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Cybersecurity services in the nature of restricting unauthorized access to computer systems; IT consulting services relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Technological consultation in the technology field of computer hardware and software systems and integration; Technological consultation in the technology field of cloud computing; Technological consultation in the technology field of enterprise architecture; Computer services, namely, on-site management of information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) cloud computing systems of others; Information technology consultancy relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Providing information relating to computer technology via a website; Technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity | ACTIVE | Aug 17, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |