USPTO serial 98728583
PATENT DRAFTING COPILOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACKO, CINDY JOYCE SAVITR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATENT DRAFTING COPILOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morgan Smith
Morgan Smith Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garret & Dunner, L.L.P.901 New York Ave NWWashington, DC 20001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for preparing intellectual property materials; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for drafting patent applications and patent-related documents using artificial intelligence; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for assisting with legal writing, research, and analysis of intellectual property materials; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for preparing intellectual property materials; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for drafting patent applications and patent-related documents using artificial intelligence; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for assisting with legal writing, research, and analysis of intellectual property materials; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for preparing intellectual property materials; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for drafting patent applications and patent-related documents; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for assisting with legal writing, research, and analysis of intellectual property materials; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for preparing intellectual property materials; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for assisting with legal writing, research, and analysis of intellectual property materials; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for drafting patent applications and patent-related documents using artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |