USPTO serial 98731554
DUMPLING KING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RISO, MARK E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUMPLING KING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Leander, TX
Leander, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DI LI
HAO LI1608 W KERR PASSLEANDER, TX 78641UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Fish dumplings; Korean stuffed dumplings; Fried noodles; Stir-fried noodles; Korean-style dumplings (mandu); Starch noodles; Gyoza being stuffed dumplings; Sweet dumplings (dango); Chinese stuffed dumplings; Chinese steamed dumplings (shumai, cooked); Chinese stuffed dumplings (gyoza, cooked); Flour-based dumplings; Dumpling skins; Chinese noodles, uncooked; Chow mein noodles; Steamed flour-based dumplings; Fried flour-based dumplings stuffed with meat; Rice, pasta and noodles; Steamed flour-based dumplings stuffed with meat; Noodles; Mix for making combined noodle and sauce dish; Noodle-based prepared meals; Rice dumplings; Steamed buns stuffed with minced meat (niku-manjuh); Shrimp dumplings; Frozen flour-based dumplings; Flour-based stuffed dumplings; Asian noodles; Chinese steamed dumplings; Stir-fried noodles with vegetables and meat; Soup dumplings (xiao long bao); Japanese stuffed dumplings; Stir-fried noodles with meat; Buns; Fried flour-based dumplings; Chinese rice noodles; Rice noodles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2025 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2024 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2024 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |