USPTO serial 98732374
GRID AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUHN, RIO NICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRID AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carissa L. Weiss
Carissa L. Weiss Law Office of Carissa L. Weiss, PLLC745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500New York, NY 10151United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Downloadable computer software, namely, software development tools for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Downloadable computer software development tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of cloud-based, non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Providing temporary use of cloud-based, non-downloadable software, namely, software development tools for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Providing temporary use of cloud-based, non-downloadable software development tools; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Research in the fields of artificial intelligence and robotics; Technology consultation in the fields of artificial intelligence and robotics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |