USPTO serial 98733237
C CORTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C CORTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond A. James
Raymond A. James Fortif Law Partners, LLC2021 Morris Avenue STE 300Birmingham, AL 35203United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for monitoring energy usage and providing operational and energy recommendations in commercial buildings | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2014 |
| 035 | Business consulting services; business consulting services relating to sustainable and environmentally friendly business practices, in the field of energy management and energy reduction for commercial buildings; non-financial business assistance and advice in the field of energy management and energy reduction for commercial buildings | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2014 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for use in the field of energy management and energy reduction for commercial buildings, namely, software for collecting, organizing, tracking, surveying, analyzing, and reporting data related to sustainable business practices and building operation; SaaS services featuring software for use in the field of energy management and energy reduction for residential and commercial buildings, namely, software for conducting quantitative analysis for use in business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization; SaaS services featuring building performance improvement tools in the field of energy management and energy reduction for commercial buildings, namely, software for generating recommendations relating to sustainability and non-financial metrics | ACTIVE | Mar 24, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |