USPTO serial 98734511
NURO AI PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NURO AI PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA, US
Mountain View, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander T. Bara
Alexander T. Bara Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC401 North Washington Street, Suite 801Rockville, MD 20850United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for hosting or distributing providing programs using artificial intelligence for use in controlling autonomous vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices; Apparatus for providing programs using artificial intelligence for use in controlling autonomous vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices and for analyzing results obtained from the programs using artificial intelligence for use in controlling vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices; Apparatus for providing Platform as a Service (PAAS) including computer software platforms for providing programs using artificial intelligence to control vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices and analyzing results obtained from the programs using artificial intelligence to control vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Robotic transport vehicles that are controlled using artificial intelligence and do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices, namely, land vehicles; Autonomous vehicles that operate using artificial intelligence and do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices, namely land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Passenger transportation services, namely, taxi transport services and shuttle transport services; Goods delivery services, namely, package pick-up and delivery services, food pick-up and delivery services, overnight delivery services, and transportation of goods; Passenger transportation services using autonomous vehicles, namely, self-driving taxi transport services and self-driving shuttle transport services; Goods delivery services using autonomous vehicles, namely, package pick-up and delivery services, food pick-up and delivery services, overnight delivery services, and transportation of goods; Transportation services using vehicles controlled using artificial intelligence, namely, taxi transport services and shuttle transport services; Transportation services provided by autonomous vehicles, namely, self-driving taxi transport services and self-driving shuttle transport services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a Service (PAAS) including computer software platforms for providing programs using artificial intelligence for use in controlling vehicles and analyzing results obtained from the programs using artificial intelligence, in the field of autonomous vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices; Platform as a Service (PAAS) including computer software platforms providing programs using artificial intelligence for use in controlling vehicles and analyzing results obtained from the programs using artificial intelligence, in the field of vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices; Software for providing artificial intelligence functionality in the field of autonomous vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices; Development of software in the field of autonomous vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices; Non-downloadable software for providing programs using artificial intelligence for controlling an autonomous vehicle that does not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices; Software platform for providing programs using artificial intelligence capabilities to enable the control and operation of vehicles that do not operate under cognitive control of neural-activated devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nuro, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nuro, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NURO AI PLATFORM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 28, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |