USPTO serial 98735612
PRISM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COUGHLAN, REBECCA D.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRISM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. PALERMO
CHRISTOPHER J. PALERMO Baker Botts, L.L.P.401 S 1st StUnit 1300Austin, TX 78704-1296Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software-as-a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence in customer data software platforms for creating unified customer databases and customer profiles that are accessible to other marketing systems; providing information about customer data resulting from the collection, analysis, storage and sharing of electronic customer data and information in a customer data software platform; research, development and design in the field of customer data platforms; development and design services all in the field of computer software used in and for use in the design, development, creation and programming of customer data platforms; technical consultancy and technical support services in the nature of diagnosing problems in customer data platforms; maintenance and support services, namely, technical advice related to the installation, use and maintenance of customer data software platforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 3, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |