USPTO serial 98741343
APERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAJESH FOTEDAR
Rajesh Fotedar Cognition IP P.C.50 California St., 1500San Francisco, CA 94111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Healthcare provider services, namely, patient appointment scheduling, patient billing and prescription management; preparing financial reports for healthcare providers; (Based on Intent To Use) Subscription services, namely, customer appointment scheduling and billing management in the nature of billing of accounts on behalf of others | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2019 |
| 036 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Healthcare provider financial services, namely, healthcare cost estimation in the nature of preparing quotes for cost estimation purposes and revenue cycle financial management; (Based on Intent To Use) Financial services for healthcare service providers, namely, cost estimation in the nature of preparing quotes for cost estimation purposes and revenue cycle financial management | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2019 |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Software as a Service for healthcare service providers featuring software for patient appointment scheduling, healthcare cost estimation, revenue cycle management, patient billing, prescription management and financial reporting; Software as a Service for healthcare service providers featuring software for patient appointment scheduling, healthcare cost estimation, revenue cycle management, patient billing, prescription management and financial reporting for healthcare service providers, namely, doctors, health clinics, nursing centers; (Based on Intent To Use) Software as a Service for healthcare service providers featuring software for customer appointment scheduling, cost estimation, revenue cycle management, billing and order management and financial reporting | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |