USPTO serial 98742413
DMX BASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DMX BASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker Holley & Menker, PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Soundproofing materials, namely, non-metal sub-floor membranes for residential and commercial soundproofing use; soundproofing materials in the nature of subfloors, namely, non-metal flooring materials for use as subfloors in the nature of non-metal sub-floor membranes for residential and commercial soundproofing use | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Flooring underlayment; non-metal subfloor panels; construction materials in the nature of subfloor panels, namely, non-metal flooring materials for use as subfloor panels; non-metal subfloor panels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 7, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |