Drawing for CLING TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 98743020

CLING TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANCHEZ RIVERA, MARIA C.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLING TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

Perry J. Viscounty LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 Town Center Drive, 20th FlCosta Mesa, CA 92626United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003non-medicated lip care preparations; lip balmACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 16, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 31, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance