USPTO serial 98744888
NEBULA TICKETSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEBULA TICKETSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eden Prairie, MN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel D. Leviton
Joel D. Leviton Stinson LLP50 South Sixth Street, Suite 2600Minneapolis, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable computing software services for electronic discovery featuring seamless, guided movement between capabilities, namely, document processing, analytics, technology assisted review, document search and review and production; providing computer forensics and discovery services; computer services, namely, application service provider in the field of electronic discovery to host computer application software to provide, host, manage, develop, and maintain electronic databases for storage and sharing of data and information; hosting an Internet website portal to allow the review and organization of data and files; hosting an interactive website to allow users to search, filter, catalogue, and sort data, files, information and content; computer forensic services, namely, detecting, recovering and securing computer data evidence for use in discovery and forensics; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for machine learning, deep learning and deep neural networks; providing online non-downloadable software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of data; computer hardware development; rental of computer hardware and software for electronic legal discovery and computer forensics, data recovery, computer forensic legal investigation, information governance, and regulatory matters; repair services for software; installation and maintenance of software for computer systems; only in the fields of electronic discovery, forensic data collection, electronic litigation support services, litigation discovery support services, electronic data management, information governance, file retention and electronic disaster recovery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |