Drawing for ONBOARD SHUNT ENHANCER

USPTO serial 98747215

ONBOARD SHUNT ENHANCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOLK, DANA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 131

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONBOARD SHUNT ENHANCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Riebling

Peter J. Riebling RIEBLING IP, PLLC1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 1025Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric apparatus and instruments, namely, onboard units, for use in railway trains for communication to railway train operators for facilitating the proper operation of railway track circuits; electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, onboard units, for use in railway trains for communication to railway train operators for the monitoring and analysis of railway track circuit conditionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 17, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance