USPTO serial 98747561
HRT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS-RIGGS, LESLIE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HRT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
Alex Patel Patel & Almeida, P. C.20700 Ventura Blvd., Suite #235Woodland Hills, CA 91364United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | inspection of aircraft engines and other aircraft equipment for quality control purposes; testing the functionality of aircraft engines; technological consultation in the technology field of product quality and quality control of aircraft engines; technology supervision and inspection of the product quality and quality control of aircraft engines; inspection of aircraft engines, other aircraft equipment, and aircraft parts for quality control purposes; engine performance reading and data analysis; computer services, namely, hosting a web site that allows users to upload, store, maintain and manage inspection, repair, servicing and maintenance records for aircraft, aircraft engines, and other aircraft parts; inspection services of aircraft engines, other aircraft equipment, and aircraft parts; inspection services of aircraft engines and other aircraft equipment; inspection of product quality of aircraft engines and other aircraft equipment; inspection of product quality of aircraft engines, other aircraft equipment, and aircraft parts; inspection services of aircraft engines and other aircraft equipment for quality control purposes; Aircraft design; Technical consultation in the field of aerospace engineering; Design and development of computer programs relating to aircraft and aircraft engines; Design and development of computer software relating to aircraft and aircraft engines; Updating and maintenance of computer software relating to aircraft and aircraft engines; Providing online non-downloadable computer software relating to aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |