USPTO serial 98749789
SCORERAG AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCORERAG AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel C. Pierron
Daniel C. Pierron Widerman Malek , PL1990 W. New Haven AvenueSecond FloorMelbourne, FL 32904Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for providing improved functionality to generative artificial intelligence software, namely, for improving the performance of retrieval-augmented generative AI software; downloadable software using artificial intelligence for natural language processing, generation, understanding, and analysis; downloadable software using machine learning for use in retrieval-augmented generative artificial intelligence software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for providing improved functionality to generative artificial intelligence software, namely, improving the performance of retrieval-augmented generative AI software; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for natural language processing, generation, understanding, and analysis; software as a service (SaaS) services using machine learning for use in retrieval-augmented generative artificial intelligence software; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for image recognition and generation; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for audio recognition and generation; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for video recognition and generation; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for computer code recognition and generation; software as a service (SaaS) services for artificial intelligence, namely, software for developing, running, and analyzing algorithms that are able to learn to analyze, classify and take actions in response to exposure to data; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for providing improved functionality to generative artificial intelligence software, namely, for improving the performance of retrieval-augmented generative AI software; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for natural language processing, generation, understanding, and analysis; providing online non-downloadable software using machine learning for use in retrieval-augmented generative artificial intelligence software; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for image recognition and generation; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for audio recognition and generation; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for video recognition and generation; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for computer code recognition and generation; providing online non-downloadable software for artificial intelligence, namely, software for developing, running, and analyzing algorithms that are able to learn to analyze, classify and take actions in response to exposure to data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2025 | LOPE | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | PBPO | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST | — |
| May 22, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |