Drawing for HANGRYBOY

USPTO serial 98755330

HANGRYBOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HANGRYBOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel E. Kattman

Daniel E. Kattman Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.1000 N. Water Street, Suite 1700Milwaukee, WI 53202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fruit-based snack food; Vegetable-based snack food; Meat-based snack food; Nut-based snack foods; Seed-based snack foods; Potato-based snack foods; High-protein seaweed-based snack bars, prepared nuts; Trail mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, dried fruit; nut butters; vegetable chips; jerkyACTIVE—
030Cereal-based snack food; Rice-based snack food; Grain-based snack foods; Wheat-based snack foods, Protein cookies, protein brownies, protein muffins, protein cinnamon rolls, protein cupcakes, granola-based snack bars, churros, baklava, croissantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 22, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 10, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 9, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 9, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2024LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Sep 17, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance