USPTO serial 98756144
BRAINCARE NEUROSCIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KONSCHAK, CARL A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAINCARE NEUROSCIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA BARBARA, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suzann Moskowitz
Suzann Moskowitz The Moskowitz Firm LLC24870 Fairmount BlvdBeachwood, OH 44122United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical device for neuro-functional analysis of the brain, namely, a medical device for monitoring and analyzing mental cognition that comprises an electroencephalograph and an electrocardiograph, and also incorporates computer hardware, recorded computer software for measuring visual and auditory processing speeds, and recorded computer software for administering and analyzing neuropsychological surveys; medical equipment and devices, namely, medical mapping devices in the nature of electroencephalographs for non-invasive measurement of brain activity; medical equipment and devices, namely, non-invasive electroencephalographs used upon the scalp with embedded software for collecting, monitoring, reviewing, and analyzing electrical brain activity data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |