USPTO serial 98757251
BLADE BALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLADE BALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, US
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. DiSchino, Esq.
Christopher A. DiSchino, Esq. DiSchino & Schamy, PLLC4770 BISCAYNE BLVD, Suite 600Miami, FL 33137United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer application software for use on mobile phones, portable media players, computers, and handheld computers for playing interactive computer games in virtual environments; Downloadable computer game programs; Downloadable computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Downloadable computer software platforms for use on mobile phones, portable media players, computers, and handheld computers for playing interactive computer games; Downloadable game software; Downloadable game software for use on mobile and cellular phones, handheld computers, computers, and portable media players; Downloadable interactive multimedia computer game programs; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for playing video games; Downloadable computer game software; Downloadable video game software; Downloadable video and computer game programs; Cases for mobile phones; Cell phone cases; Mouse pads; Wireless charging mouse pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Fancy key chains; Key chains of precious metal; Non-metal key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Action figure toys; Board games; Fidget toys; Inflatable pool toys; Molded toy figures; Plastic character toys; Plush toys; Pop tube fidget toys; Toy action figures; Toy robots; Toy swords; Smart plush toys; Spinning fidget toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2026 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2025 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 20, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |