USPTO serial 98760113
ONEPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRAVTSOFF, ELENA V N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONEPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bobby A. Ghajar
Bobby A. Ghajar Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for conducting financial transactions and for transfer of funds and for making payments; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for use as a digital wallet; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for accruing, managing, and redeeming merchant rewards, discounts, rebates, and cash back, and promotion, management, and access to customer incentive, reward and discount programs; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling payment via virtual cards; (Based on Intent To Use) Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for management of personal finance, financial management, financial planning, providing financial information, budgeting, and credit and debt management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing, storing, transferring and viewing money and funds; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing and viewing bank accounts and money pockets; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing and viewing earned wage and early pay access data and information, and for facilitating personal finance through earned wage and early pay access tools; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for accessing banking services, and credit and loan services; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for making advance payments for prepaid and pay as you go cards; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling access to investment services, managing and providing brokerage and trading of investments services, and providing information regarding investments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |