Drawing for DEADZONE: ROGUE

USPTO serial 98761455

DEADZONE: ROGUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNER, CHRISTIAN LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEADZONE: ROGUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAURI S. THOMPSON

LAURI S. THOMPSON Greenberg Traurig, LLP10845 Griffith Peak DriveSuite 600Las Vegas, NV 89135

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable video-game software; video-game software that may be downloaded from a global computer network; downloadable video-game software for use on mobile devices, tablets, and cellular phones; downloadable video-game software for use in operating standalone computer devicesACTIVEApr 29, 2025

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2026RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 21, 2026RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 20, 2026GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 20, 2026GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 20, 2026CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 29, 2026GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2026GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2026CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 29, 2026AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 29, 2026IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 29, 2026EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2026GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2026GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2026CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 9, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 9, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 10, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jul 10, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 9, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance