Drawing for TRIM-X

USPTO serial 98761486

TRIM-X

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 651
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIM-X?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip L. Conrad

Philip L. Conrad BENOIT & COTE INC.560 Cremazie Boul. East, 3rd floorMontreal, Quebec, H2P1E8Canada

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely street sweepers for weed control; hydraulic and mechanical rotary weed removing machines; cleaning and sweeping equipment and accessories, namely hydraulic weed removers as part of self-propelled sweeping machines; road sweepers and parts thereof; rotary brushes for weed control machines.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 13, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 15, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 10, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 30, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance