Drawing for SHIELDPRO

USPTO serial 98768837

SHIELDPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, GEORGE WILLIAM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHIELDPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kass

Jeffrey H. Kass Dickinson Wright PLLC1850 N. Central Ave.14th FloorPhoenix, AZ 85004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication Base station units for controlling wireless home and personal security devices; wireless security devices, namely, key touch pads for use with electronic door locks and for controlling base station units, electronic security motion sensors, panic buttons in the nature of personal security alarms, security alarms, and remote activation devices, namely, remote controls for security alarms; Wireless home security systems comprised of telecommunication base stations for controlling wireless home and personal security devices, key touch pads for use with electronic door locks and for controlling base station units, entry motion sensors, motion sensors, electronic glass break detectors, security cameras, electronic water sensors for detecting leaks and floods, smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, temperature sensors, panic buttons in the nature of personal security alarms, electronic key fobs being remote control apparatus, sirens, and also including yard signs made of paper or plastic; electronic glass break detectors; smoke detectors and CO detectors; electronic water sensors for detecting leaks and floods; electronic temperature and freeze sensors; security video cameras; electronic video door bells, namely, electric doorbells featuring video cameras; and, electronic door locks; security camera lights, namely, security lights specially adapted for use with security camerasACTIVE—
011Lighting apparatus installations for homes; electric night lights; floodlights; spotlights; wall lights; smart lights, namely, lighting installationsACTIVE—
042Providing online non-downloadable software for controlling and monitoring wireless home and personal security devicesACTIVE—
045Monitoring of home security systems and alarms for protecting personal property; monitoring services of home security systems for protecting personal property via alerts that notify users as to a security device status changeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 21, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 1, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance