Drawing for IMPERIAL VALLEY 21488 TRADITION REDEFINED

USPTO serial 98770177

IMPERIAL VALLEY 21488 TRADITION REDEFINED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 748
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CANTONE, KERI H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMPERIAL VALLEY 21488 TRADITION REDEFINED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisel M. Ferguson

Lisel M. Ferguson Rimon PC1655 W. Fairview Ave. Ste. 102Boise, ID 83702United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029All natural organic beef; fresh all natural organic beef; and dried beefACTIVESep 23, 2026

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2026SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 31, 2026EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 24, 2026IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 24, 2026EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 23, 2026EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 23, 2026EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2026EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2026TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 28, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 28, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 28, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2026EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2025MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance