USPTO serial 98771947
SAVVY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OBREGON, MICHAEL A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAVVY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Austin, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM D. WIESE
WILLIAM D. WIESE DUBOIS, BRYANT & CAMPBELL, LLP303 COLORADO STREETSUITE 2300AUSTIN, TX 78701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | vacation real estate listing services | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2026 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |