USPTO serial 98772534
AI CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABID, NABEELA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AI CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cartography and mapping services; Electronic navigation services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining geographic and location information, maps, directions, real time location and user generated content, business locations information and ratings, via a global computer network; Providing customer-defined and generated content and content of others based on the known or estimated geographical location of businesses, events, residences, personal addresses, and physical locations through a global computer network; Searching and retrieving information, sites, and other resources based on physical and electronic location identifiers available on computer networks for others; Computer services, namely, creating computer network-based indexes of information, websites and resources; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for location-referencing and providing information services for use in the field of micro-location; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for location-referencing and providing information services for use in the fields of logistics, location services, and AI and voice enabled technologies; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for location-referencing and providing information services for use with micro-location geocoding technologies; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for GPS tracking for use with services platforms; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for digitizing, referencing, and sharing micro-locations and micro-location information; Software as a Service (SaaS) and location-referencing and information services featuring software for use with healthcare, public safety, security, and emergency services; Mapping services; Mapping services featuring geographic and location information by capturing, creating, curating, and publishing micro-locations for mapping, geography, transportation, and related services, including user-generated content, business location, search, demographic, and geo-spatial information, via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |