USPTO serial 98774702
CHALICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, TRENTON MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
Need help with CHALICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Indianapolis, IN, US
Indianapolis, IN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY WRIGHT
AMY WRIGHT Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLPOne Indiana Square, Suite 3500Indianapolis, IN 46204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-shirts; Hats; Hooded sweatshirts; Shirts, none of the foregoing including hand knitted accessories or t-shirts for charitable and volunteer organizations | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2015 |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring shirts, T-shirts, hooded sweatshirts, and hats | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 4, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 4, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |