Drawing for LIQID ULTRASTACK

USPTO serial 98777421

LIQID ULTRASTACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RILEY, KATHERINE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIQID ULTRASTACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole Swartz

Nicole Swartz Setter Roche Smith & Shellenberger LLP1860 Blake Street, Ste. 500Denver, CO 80202United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Supercomputers; Computer hardware; Computer hardware and recorded software systems for management and deployment of computing resources such as networking, data processing, storage, graphics processing, acceleration, and memory; Computers for use in data managementACTIVEOct 1, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 19, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 18, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance