USPTO serial 98781889
LIVE VERIFIED MONITORING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECKER, JOSEPH RAPHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIVE VERIFIED MONITORING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LuAnne Morrow
LuAnne Morrow Locke Lord LLP300 S. Grand Ave., Suite 2600Los Angeles, CA 90071United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | vibration sensors; motion sensors; Biometric sensors for access control systems; remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote location; wireless security cameras | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Monitoring of camera by remote access | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | monitoring of burglar and security alarms; Consultancy services in the field of business and industrial security, namely physical security measures being surveillance cameras, wireless surveillance towers, security guards, alarms and locks; guard patrol security services; security guard services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |