USPTO serial 98782993
EMERALD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAROTTA, GABRIELLE CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMERALD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney Lee & Hayes, PC601 W. Riverside Ave Suite 1400Spokane, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Packing machines and specialty automated packaging machines, namely, packing machines, assembling machines being a series of machines for assembling packaging equipment in successive stages, labeling machines being electronic label printing machines for commercial use, printing machines for commercial or industrial use, foil wrapping machines, cartooning machines, and sleeving being packaging machines; Packing machines and specialty automated packaging machines, namely, power operated carton sealing machines, carton erectors being cartoning machines, case flippers being conveyor machines, pallet dispensers being pallet conveyors, pallet sackers being pallet conveyors, settler conveyors being conveyor machines, tray dormers being packaging machines, tray lidders being packaging machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom design and manufacturing for others of packing line machinery, packing machinery, palletizers being machinery, case packing machinery, box building machinery, packaging building machinery, bulk product case packer being machinery, packing line integration equipment being machinery, and packing line optimization equipment being machinery; Custom design and manufacturing for others of packing machinery and specialty automated packaging machinery; Consulting services in the field of manufacturing line integration being manufacturing process consulting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |