USPTO serial 98790092
PROPHESEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROPHESEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm J. Rich
Norm J. Rich FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 600Washington HarbourWashington, DC 20007-5109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business and management consulting in the health care field, namely, providing chronic care management services, utilizing artificial intelligence, machine learning and other predictive data analytic techniques to health insurance companies, self-insured employer groups, and other healthcare organizations for the purposes of patient evaluation, risk stratification, care and therapy coordination and management, projecting and managing health care and therapy utilization and costs, developing interventions to help patients continue with prescribed care and therapy, and improve outcomes and manage financial risk across a provider network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services directed to health insurance companies, self-insured employer groups and other healthcare organizations featuring predictive analytics software utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning for use in utilizing patient data to predict compliance with therapy, projecting and managing health care and therapy utilization and costs, stratifying risk of patient non-compliance, developing interventions to help patients continue with prescribed care and therapy, and to help manage patient outcomes and financial risk across a provider network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |