Drawing for FACILIQ

USPTO serial 98794149

FACILIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 649Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O'NEILL, MARY K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Need help with FACILIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Tucker

Brian Tucker KIRTON MCCONKIE36 S. State Street, #1900Salt Lake City, UT 84111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing real estate portfolios, namely, software for capital planning, vendor oversight, site audits, and incident reporting; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for real estate portfolio optimization, namely, software for asset lifecycle optimization including budgeting, forecasting, contractor oversight, audit workflows, and portfolio-level operational intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing capital expendituresACTIVEOct 9, 2024

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2026RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Sep 29, 2026RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2026RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Sep 1, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 5, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 1, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 26, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 10, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance