USPTO serial 98794476
KARNO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KARNO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cedar Park, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Beth Albert
Julie Beth Albert Baker Botts L.L.P.2001 Ross AvenueSuite 900Dallas, TX 75201-2900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Generators for stationary and mobile power generation. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Organizing and conducting business networking events in the field of sustainable energy generation; Market analysis and research services in the fields of sustainable energy generation. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, development and dissemination of printed educational materials of others, namely, articles in the field of sustainable energy generation; providing educational materials in the nature of online non-downloadable videos in the field of sustainable energy generation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development of technology in the field of sustainable energy generation. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 28, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |