Drawing for SENERGY BIOTRANSDUCER PRO

USPTO serial 98795472

SENERGY BIOTRANSDUCER PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENERGY BIOTRANSDUCER PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ruth Khalsa

Ruth Khalsa The Ideas Law Firm, PLLC975 E Dava DriveTempe, AZ 85283United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical device in the nature of microcurrent Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) units for pain managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 2, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance