USPTO serial 98801158
BLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRAVTSOFF, ELENA V N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maxim A. Voltchenko
Maxim A. Voltchenko Kaplan Breyer Schwarz, LLP317 George Street, Ste 320New Brunswick, NJ 08901United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | software as a service (saas) services featuring software for the automation of security operations activities, including incident response investigation, and analysis, threat and vulnerability management, event workflow and response, mitigation and remediation orchestration, and security intelligence reporting; IT services, namely, IT consultancy services; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for automating it security, protection and restoration services in the nature of securing virtual and physical infrastructure and security operations activities, including incident response investigation, and analysis, threat and vulnerability management, event workflow and response, mitigation and remediation orchestration, and security intelligence reporting; data security consultancy; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable enterprise security software used for the automation of security operations activities including incident response investigation and analysis, threat and vulnerability management, event, alert and alarm analytics, triage, workflow and response, mitigation and remediation orchestration and security intelligence and reporting; computer network security consultation in the field of incident response investigation and analysis, threat and vulnerability management, event, alert and alarm analytics, triage, workflow and response, mitigation and remediation orchestration and security intelligence and reporting; computer consultancy services in the field of computer and network security vulnerabilities; computer consultancy services in the field of computer security systems via a global computer network; monitoring of computer systems operation by remote access for security purposes, namely, integrating vulnerability testing, vulnerability prioritization and remediation, managing testing and scanning tools, providing application risk visibility to detect breakdowns and unauthorized access or data breach, and to ensure proper functioning; consultancy in the field of security software | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | licensing of software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | LOPE | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |