USPTO serial 98802710
ASKPIPER.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAJEDA, HECTOR M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASKPIPER.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami Beach, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi Tandy
Heidi Tandy Berger Singerman LLP1450 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1900Miami, FL 33131United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a website featuring a software program in the nature of a recommendations engine; Providing a website in the nature of a software program featuring a recommendations aid; Providing a website featuring a software program in the nature of a large language model recommendations engine; Providing a website in the nature of a software program featuring a large language model recommendations aid; Providing a website featuring a software program in the nature of an AI-based recommendations engine; Providing a website in the nature of a software program featuring an AI-based recommendations aid; Providing online non-downloadable content in the nature of a software application that provides recommendations about products and services, using artificial intelligence, on the subjects of in the area of retail stores, fashion and clothing, cosmetics and skin care goods and services, beauty and aesthetic goods and services, personal care goods and services, lifestyle and wellness goods and services, and home décor and design goods and services; entertainment services in the nature of providing online non-downloadable event management software for managing entertainment information on the topics of retail stores, fashion and clothing, cosmetics and skin care goods and services, beauty and aesthetic goods and services, personal care goods and services, lifestyle and wellness goods and services, and home décor and design goods and services; informational services, namely, providing marketing research information on the topics of retail stores, fashion and clothing, cosmetics and skin care goods and services, beauty and aesthetic goods and services, personal care goods and services, lifestyle and wellness goods and services, and home décor and design goods and services, all excluding wresting, wrestlers and wrestling events | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 12, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |