USPTO serial 98808560
CALO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CALO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jun-Hwa Jeong
Jun-Hwa Jeong Rabin & Berdo, P.C.2650 Park Tower Drive, Suite 800Vienna, VA 22180United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Acupoint massage apparatus; massage apparatus for medical purposes; medical electric esthetic massage apparatus for skin massage for household purposes; massaging apparatus for personal use; massage apparatus for neck and shoulders; electrically operated massagers in the nature of electromechanical massage mechanism for chairs; electric massage apparatus for household use; vibration massaging apparatus for household purposes; electric massage apparatus for personal use; portable electric massaging apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |